Question
Asked by Mr.JNB from Germany | Apr. 08, 2009 15:04
About:Cao Cao

Even though I don't like Cao Cao very much, after getting a bit into the actual history, not the "modified" version of Luo Guanzhong, I have to admit that he was a very skilled leader and politician.
Liu Bei may have been a more kind ruler, but in the end he did lack some qualities a man needs to unify a country. And even if Cao Cao and his successors were tyrants, they managed to end an era of nearly constant war, which deserves respect.
And lastly he did never let the world betray him.

Answers (1)
Answered by Mr.Chakraborty from USA | May. 20, 2009 21:13
00Reply
Liu Bei was too nice for his own good. He wouldn't get far in a world of chaos. Cao Cao was a capable leader who could've taken out the remaining kingdoms had it not been for his defeat at Chi Bi.
Related Questions:
cao cao is awesome! my whole classed liked it i have to sy thankyou very mu...
Asked by Mr.gjd from dfgds
| Apr. 29, 2009 15:58
1
answer
Cao Cao was a true visionary, my favorite figure from the Three Kingdoms er...
Asked by Mr.Chakraborty from USA
| Aug. 17, 2009 05:20
1
answer
In fact, I think the most 2 respectable aspects of Cao Cao are his contribu...
Asked by Mr.Mocci from China
| Jan. 17, 2010 22:01
1
answer
guan yu should have kill cao meng-te...i hate that cao cao
Asked by Mr.jamaican from usa
| Sep. 27, 2009 22:32
1
answer
I am dying to go to Bozhou to see Cao Cao park and the museum inside. Can a...
Asked by Mr.Ela from Russia
| Apr. 27, 2011 22:31
1
answer
I cannot agrre with you. Where's the 3 mens oath at the peach garden? When ...
Asked by Mr.David Moza from Indonesia
| Apr. 23, 2009 22:19
1
answer
Ask a Question
Categories:
Question Summary (100 characters)
Details (optional) (2,000 characters)